Review by
Bob Ignizio
Every once
in a while, a mainstream film comes along that seems to please everyone. The
critics give it high grades, general audiences feel like they got their money’s
worth and then some, and even the nit picky fanboys pronounce it acceptable.
And when that happens, there’s always that one critic (well, usually a few more
than one, but you get the idea) who has to be the contrary asshole. Guess it’s
my turn to be that critic with SPIDER-MAN:
HOMECOMING
HOMECOMING thankfully skips the already
twice-depicted-on-film story of how Peter Parker (Tom Holland) became Spider-Man, and instead picks up where we left
the webslinger at the end of CAPTAIN
AMERICA: CIVIL WAR. He’s just helped Tony Stark/Iron Man (Robert Downey
Jr., natch) in his conflict with Captain America, and now thinks he’s ready for
the super hero big leagues.
For Stark,
though, Peter is largely an afterthought as he moves on to other projects and
priorities. He leaves Peter with the fancy new suit he was given in CIVIL WAR, and assigns his personal
assistant Happy Hogan (Jon Favreu) to keep an eye on the kid. It’s a job Hogan
doesn’t take all that seriously, as he’s in the midst of moving all the various
high-tech gadgetry from Avengers Tower to the team’s new HQ.
Determined
to prove that he’s ready to be an Avenger, Spidey heads out to fight crime in
his neighborhood with the best of intentions, but not always with the best
results. Eventually, he stumbles across a group of criminals selling weapons
made from tech left over from the aliens in THE AVENGERS and the deactivated androids of AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON.
The leader
of the crime ring is The Vulture/Adrian Toomes (Michael Keaton). Toomes was
originally hired to clean up the mess left behind in AVENGERS, and had even bought extra trucks and supplies for the job.
However, he was kicked off the job site in favor of a special crew called
Damage Control, a company owned by Tony Stark. Toomes feels as if he’s been
screwed over by Stark and other rich fat cats, and selling the stolen villain
tech is his way of getting his fair share.
Toomes also has
a few notable crew members: Phineaus Mason aka “The Tinkerer” (not sure they
actually call him that in the movie, played by Michael Chernus), and trusted
muscle Herman Schultz (Bokeem Woodbine), who becomes the second and most effective
of Toomes’ henchman to take up the weaponry and moniker of Shocker.
There’s also
plenty going on in Peter’s personal life, which he has difficulty juggling with
his would-be heroics. He still manages to do good in school, but his
extracurricular activities as part of an academic decathlon team suffer. Peter
also accidentally reveals his secret identity to his best friend Ned (Jacab
Batalon, playing a character obviously inspired by the best friend of Marvel’s other Spider-Man, Miles Morales). Peter
also has two potential romantic interests: the popular leader of the decathlon
team Liz (Laura Harrier), and quiet but acerbic when she does talk team member
Michelle aka “MJ” (Zendaya). Marisa Tomei is also on hand as Peter’s Aunt May,
but doesn’t really do much.
That’s an
awful lot of plot and characters to keep straight. As a result, there’s a
certain amount of clunkiness to the proceedings, though not as bad in that
regard as, say, BATMAN V. SUPERMAN.
It still hardly flows, though. And some of it could easily have been eliminated
by getting rid of most, if not all, of the Tony Stark/Iron Man stuff. I know
part of HOMECOMING’s mandate was to
fully integrate Spider-Man into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but that’s
already done via the Vulture selling alien tech and the brief recap of Spidey’s
involvement in CIVIL WAR early in
the film. It’s not as if Downey is a co-star or anything, but there’s still too
much of him and Favreau.
And that
brings us to another of my gripes: the Spidey suit Stark gives to Peter. As it
turns out, it’s not just a suit. It’s an overly complicated gadget complete
with a talking AI. Why does a guy who already has super human strength, web
shooters, can stick to walls, and knows when danger is nearby thanks to his “spider
sense” need this? It’s just a dumb plot device that adds more clutter to the
film.
Let me be
clear. I don’t hate SPIDER-MAN:
HOMECOMING. It has a winning cast, with Holland in particular doing a great
job bringing Peter/Spidey to life. There’s humor and action and fun, and as
some who liked the movie more than me have pointed out, it’s atypical to see a
film like this where the hero has to really work at learning how to be super.
But there are also a lot of overly familiar plot elements.
As much as
Keaton’s performance is one of the highlights of the film, his character’s arc
feels way too much like Willem DaFoe’s Green Goblin in the first Toby Maguire SPIDER MAN film. Making him more
working class gives it a bit of a twist, but the similarities still stick out
to me. And man am I tired of superhero movies where the hero is completely
incapable of keeping his or her secret identity secret. Why even bother wearing
a mask?
And just on
a basic cinematic level, this movie really does feel like product to me. The
best way I can describe John Watts directions is “capable”. That’s not an
insult. The guy managed to take the helm of a multi-million dollar franchise
and not screw the pooch. No easy task, that. But it doesn’t feel as if Watts
has done anything but be a good company man here. He certainly didn’t put his
stamp on the material the way Sam Raimi did with his Spider trilogy, or even
Marc Webb with his two web-slinging entries. Ditto for the six-headed beast
that wrote the screenplay. The varioius writers managed to hammer out something
that fit the needs of Marvel as a company and is a reasonably entertaining
story, but it just doesn’t feel necessary to me.
Clearly many
critics and viewers disagree, so take my review how you will. I’m certainly not
trying to dissuade anyone from seeing HOMECOMING
if they’re in the mood for a Spider-man movie. I just can’t get join in with
everyone else giving it full-throated praise. 2 ½ out of 4 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.