Review by Charles Cassady, Jr.
In addition making a superstar out of a cowboy TV actor
named Clint Eastwood, A FISTFUL OF DOLLARS was the first well-known
"spaghetti western." This was the rather derogatory term for Italian cowboy
movies made far away from the beaten trails of America's
Monument Valley
or even the low-budget Monogram Pictures backlot.
In the 1960s Italians, Spanish, German and even Israelis
started making their own westerns, sticking to the classic iconography of gun
duels, saloons and desperadoes on horseback, but without the censorship codes
of Hollywood. Actually, the Germans
were at the lead of the pack in this one, doing “Sauerkraut Westerns” based on the
novels of their own uber-popular western novelist Karl May. The Italian movie
industry jumped eagerly on board the chuckwagon.
In the case of Italian director Sergio Leone, there was
not just an elevated level of violence, but also a then-groundbreaking
filmmaking style, with an emphasis on long, tense closeups of the actors faces,
wide-screen camera compositions and hauntingly unusual music by Ennio
Morricone. Westerns had been jokingly called "horse operas" before.
Leone made them something close to real opera, and his style was much imitated.
It also helped that Leone was recommended the lean, little-regarded young
American actor Eastwood to as a recurring hero (Morricone originally wanted
Henry Fonda or James Coburn), triggering another illustrious career.
A FISTFUL OF DOLLARS is a close remake of a renown
Japanese samurai drama YOJIMBO (director Akira Kurosawa was reportedly not
happy about the imitation), with guns instead of swords.
Setting is a grim Mexican border town called San Miguel.
Into its dusty streets rides an American, the Eastwood character, who would
become known as The Man With No Name. After getting bullied by some gunmen (who
also harass a little boy by shooting at him), TMWNN learns from a friendly
saloon-keeper what's up with the place. It's a lawless town that makes money
buying guns and ammunition cheaply, then selling it to the Indians. Moreover,
there are two factions involved, frequently killing each other. One is bossed
by the corrupt sheriff/mayor Baxter and his family. The other is a rival gang
led by the Rojo brothers.
In a standard American movie from this time, the
white-hatted cowboy hero, maybe with a faithful sidekick, would take care of
all of the bad guys one by one, fair and square (and probably sing a song or
two). Not the Clint Eastwood character. Instead (after impressing everyone with
his marksmanship by killing four men at once) he hires on with the Baxter gang,
then with the Rojo gang, studying their methods and informing each criminal
boss about the other one's movements, turning them against each other. He also
pockets substantial money from each for his services. Even when he gets caught
by the Rojos (for a truly selfless and noble act, helping an innocent family
escape their clutches), the Rojos still think he's working for the Baxters, and
take revenge accordingly. By the end, the one gang has wiped out the other, and
Eastwood can handle the bad guys left over.
Though he doesn't come across as all that horrible these
days, The Man With No Name was a pretty disturbing character to American
censors. When DOLLARS first aired on TV, the studio hastily shot a prologue
(with an Eastwood stand-in with his back to the camera) to explain that he's
got a higher purpose than profit - he's really an undercover US lawman being
sent on a mission to clean up the town, by guile and stealth. Word is that
Clint Eastwood was not amused. There is a scrap of incidental dialogue about
the Man With No Name’s past to indicate that the gunslinger empathizes deeply
with the victims in San Miguel, not the victimizers.
Sergio Leone did two followup features about the Man With
No Name, FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE and the one that took the whole franchise to a
masterpiece level, THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY. All were worldwide hits, and
cowboy pictures would never be the same. (3 ¼ out of 4 stars)
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.