In concept, THE
EXPENDABLES films have enough cultural caché, gritty drive and sweat-slicked
human meat to play greasy, mugging John Henry against the modern blockbuster
machine, with all its CG robots and green screen fancy-pantsing. In execution, however, they fall
woefully short, feeling less like the flesh-and-bone, stunt-driven actioners of
yesterday than plodding victory laps after the fact.
Patrick Hughes’ (RED HILL)
THE EXPENDABLES 3 is no exception.
In true Expendables fashion, I could exhaust my word count
on the role call alone: Sylvestor
Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Randy Couture, Terry Crews and
Dolph Lundgren (who is seriously starting to look like a scientist tried to
build a Mickey Rourke that is also a Rutger Hauer) all return to their roles
(Barney, Christmas, Yin Yang, Toll Road, Caeser and Gunner, respectively) to
grunt and gambol their way through a fill-in-the-blank action movie template.
It’s no secret to
either the audience or the filmmakers that the first film’s novelty - watching
Hollywood’s 20th century action elite buddy up to quash injustice - has long since dwindled, so Sly and the gang (co-writers Creighton Rothenberger
and Katrin Benedikt ) make two separate attempts to inject new life into the franchise.
First, of course, there’s the addition of even more old-fashioned cinematic
hardbodies (and Kelsey Grammer). The film begins with Barney's crew rescuing wild-eyed physician Doctor Death
(Wesley Snipes) from an enemy prison. Later,
a sleepwalking Harrison Ford shows up as The Expendables government handler,
who enlists the team to take down Conrad Stonebanks, an international terrorist
and - *gasp* former Expendable -
played with maniacal panache by Mel Gibson. When Barney decides to fire his
veteran teammates in a bid to save them from certain death, he relies on a
well-connected contact named Bonaparte –
i.e., Kelsey Grammar – to help assemble a new team. Antonio Banderas rounds out
the cast as Galgo, a saucy Latin chatterbox whose enthusiasm to be an
Expendable is used to limp, but dogged, comic effect.
While Snipes is passably amusing, and Ford and Grammar are
non-starters with screentime barely in excess of cameos, Gibson and Banderas
manage to bring a surprising amount of life to the otherwise wholly predictable
and mediocre film.
While most of the franchise’s actors play soundbyte-spewing
extensions of their on-screen personas, Gibson seems to be engaging directly with the
public’s disdain for him, personally, as a human being – hell, it’s reflected
in the plot: the disgraced actor plays the fallen, evil member of a
once-glorious team made up of aging, but still respected, celebrities. And he
plays it with demented relish, hitting a mark somewhere between comic book
supervillainy and Alzheimer’s, spitting out lines like, “I’ll cut open your
meat shirt and show you your heart” with an insane, wild-eyed gusto that’s as
repulsive as it is enthralling.
Banderas, meanwhile, succeeds on energy alone. As written, Galgo
is an obnoxious, predictable attempt at comic relief. As performed, Banderas
imbues the nattering Cassanova with an effete, eccentric charm that’s so
different from the dependable, grimacing masculinity of the rest of the film,
it can’t help but feel refreshing.
The second tactic deployed to keep EXPENDABLES 3 fresh is the introduction of a wide-eyed group of
battle-hungry young bucks (and one doe) who bring not just brawn, but also tech
savvy, to Barney’s new squad. Introduced in the blandest assembling-the-team
sequence ever, the Junior Expendables – Smilee (Kellan Lutz), Luna (Ronda Rousey),
Thorn (Glen Powell) and Mars (Victor Ortiz) are played by a retinue of brawny
but largely unfamiliar (at least to me) Hollywood newbies.
As with the film’s treatment of Gibson, there’s a ghost of
potential for a bit of tongue-in-cheek cultural engagement – action movies have
become an anonymous slurry of pretty, young faces lost in computer-generated
fray in a genre where personality and name-recognition used to be kings. But
the tensions between our stalwart Expendables and their larval contemporaries
don’t amount to much more than lazy old man jokes and the addition of more
flailing bodies into already dizzying, overstuffed fight sequences.
Yeah - “overstuffed fight sequences” pretty aptly describes
everything I haven’t mentioned. While I felt EXPENDABLES 3 was better paced in
both the frequency and placement of action scenes than the prior entries, the set pieces themselves are
so busy with characters and so typical in execution, there’s not much to talk
about. I guess the film’s okay at varying up the vehicles involved… there’s
also about five minutes where it looks like the movie is going to take a cue
from FAST FIVE and inject new life into the franchise with some heist movie
theatrics, but the promise is quickly abandoned in lieu of prescribed
deployment of heavy artillery.
Though marketed as the ultimate combination of the largest living action stars, there has yet to be an Expendables film worth the sum of
those parts. Though THE EXPENDABLES 3 demonstrates brief flashes of originality,
and ever briefer, buried moments of self-conscious cultural engagement, it’s
ultimately another exercise in homogenized destruction, less a steely-eyed, hard-driving contender to the
Hollywood machine than a disgruntled passenger, tired of the ride, but
unwilling to give up its seat. (2 out of 4 stars)
Your last statement pretty much sums up my thoughts on all the Expendables films thus far... in no way equal to the sum of their parts. I want to like the films so much because I grew up on Stalllone and Schwarzenegger but I just can't get behind them. They have moments but overall I'm let wanting something more or at the very least something... better
ReplyDelete