Review by Bob
Ignizio
PAIN & GAIN
tells the more or less true story of how a group of bodybuilders in
Miami, Florida who decided to embark on a kidnapping and extortion
spree in the mid 1990s. Daniel Lugo (Mark Wahlberg) is arguably the
brains of the group, a guy who feels he's owed a bigger slice of the
American Dream and isn't above breaking the law to get it.
Inspired
to become a “doer” by “Johnny Wu” (an obvious stand-in for
infomercial king Tom Vu), Daniel comes up with a get rich quick
scheme: He'll kidnap Jewish/Colubian deli magnate Victor Kershaw
(Tony Shaloub), one of his clients at the Sun Gym, and get him to
sign over everything he's got. To aid in his plot, Daniel drafts
fellow bodybuilders Adrian Doorbal (Anthony Mackie), who works
part time at a taco stand and has “performance” issues due to his
steroid use, and Paul Doyle (Dwayne
Johnson), an ex-con, ex-cocaine addict turned born-again-Christian
who somehow manages to rationalize his crimes as being okay with the
Lord.
Lugo's
plan, if it had been executed properly, might actually have worked.
The problem for Lugo was that he and his fellow criminals were all
incompetent morons. It takes multiple botched attempts before they
finally abduct Kershaw, and even that marginal success is quickly
followed by one mistake after the other as the muscle-bound
miscreants keep digging themselves a deeper and deeper hole. That's
about as far into the story as I want to go for the sake of those
looking to avoid spoilers, but suffice it to say things get both
grislier and more ridiculous as time goes on, eventually prompting
the involvement of private detective Ed Du Bois (Ed Harris).
With
a budget of a mere $25 million, PAIN & GAIN
is practically an indie film by producer/director Michael Bay's
standards. This is closer to something like Richard Linklatter's dark
true-crime comedy BERNIE than
the action fare Bay is generally known for. Of course the story Bay
chose to dramatize has considerably more strippers, car chases, and
explosions in it than Linklatter's film, but still, by his standards
this is pretty low key fare. At times, I think Bay may even have been
poking a little fun at himself, as in the trademark scene where his
stars walk casually away from an explosion. Then
again maybe we've just seen Bay recycle that shot so many times that
we can't help but laugh at it. Either way, there are plenty of other
genuine laughs to be found.
Of
course, this being based on actual events in which actual people
died, the idea of playing the scenario for laughs may be a bit
problematic for some. Also problematic is the way that both the
kidnappers and their victims are treated with a sort of moral
equivalency by the film. Both Kershaw and a later abductee are
portrayed as unlikeable and borderline criminal to the point that it
feels like we're not supposed to emotionally invest in them too much.
At the same time, the bad guys are such a hoot that we kind of like
them. That could be played for subversive ends, but this isn't that
kind of film. It just wants to entertain its audience without making
them too uncomfortable, even if maybe they should be squirming a bit.
It's
also a bit disingenuous of the film to keep hammering home the point
that “this is a true story”. Not “inspired by a true story”,
not “based on a true story”, but “this IS a true story.” And
we are told this not just at the beginning, but at other points in
the film. It's enough to make you understand how Bill Clinton could
as for a definition of the word “is”, if people are going to use
it so casually. Having been suitably intrigued by the film to read
the articles it was based on (feel free to do so as well here), I can
say the film definitely oversells its authenticity. A lot of the more
jaw dropping moments are indeed factual, but there are a lot of
omissions and alterations.
All
that said, had this been a complete work of fiction I would have no
hesitation in saying I quite enjoyed it. And given that I've seen
more than enough Hollywood “true stories” to know better, it
still doesn't bother me all that much. If nothing else it's worth it
for the performances (especially Johnson, who gets a rare chance to
remind us that he actually is a really good comedic actor, and Shalhoub, who pretty much kills it in everything he's in). It doesn't
happen often, but I'm going to have to admit that I liked a Michael
Bay movie. 3 out of 4 stars.

No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.