[31 Days of Halloween 2016: HUSH is now available on home video, VOD, and Netflix streaming.]
Review by Bob Ignizio
* Note: As with last year’s 31 Days of Halloween marathon of
horror movie reviews, we’ll be diving deep into the new release section looking
for modern horror fare. We'll be hoping for the best, but frankly expecting the
worst. *
Just as the recently released thriller THE GOOD NEIGHBOR is a spiritual descendent of I SAW WHAT YOU DID, so too does this year's HUSH draw inspiration from films of the past without being a true
remake. In this case, the models are WAIT
UNTIL DARK, a home invasion thriller in which recently blinded Audrey
Hepburn has to fight off crooks looking for a doll filled with stolen heroin,
and HEAR NO EVIL, in which Marlee
Matlin plays a deaf woman being stalked by a dirty cop searching for a stolen
coin in her apartment.
In HUSH, the
masked killer stalking deaf/mute mystery writer Maddie Young (Kate Siegel, who also co-wrote the screenplay) has
no such clear motivation. He's cut more from the cloth of modern slashers of
the sort found in FUNNY GAMES and THE STRANGERS, strictly out for
homicidal kicks.
After dispatching Maddie's neighbor only a few feet away from
Maddie as she sits typing on her computer, The killer (John Gallagher, Jr.) realizes
she can't hear. He figures this will give him even more opportunity to
sadistically toy with his next victim, but Maddie proves to be far more
resilient than he imagined.
There's not much to HUSH
beyond an extended game of cat and mouse, which explains its relatively short
(81 minutes counting opening and closing credits) running time. Nothing wrong
with a lean, efficient thriller, and parts of HUSH work on that level. But as often happens in thrillers of this
sort, the plot relies on stupid behavior from characters who are supposed to be
smart in order to move forward, and that's when I start to get annoyed.
The main issue in that respect here comes at about the hour
mark. But when you get there, you'll know the moment I'm talking about. Based
on the almost universal positive reviews this film has been given, most viewers
seem inclined to shrug it off. I couldn't.
As with his previous feature OCCULUS, director Mike Flanagan shows considerable style and skill
when it comes to creating tension. But he has also shown in both films a
tendency to expect his strengths to cover up weaknesses in writing plausible
situations, or exploring characters and themes in any real depth. It kind of
worked for me in OCCULUS, where the
supernatural, reality warping premise further helped cover up any narrative
weaknesses. That wasn't the case for me with this exercise in more grounded
horror.
Like all of the non-"found footage" films released
by Blumhouse, HUSH is polished and
professional. And up until the moment I alluded to earlier, it's reasonably
effective. Given that no less a horror icon than Stephen King has placed the
film on the same level as John Carpenter's seminal HALLOWEEN, apparently it's effective all the way through for many.
That, however, was not my experience. I'd certainly understand if you listened
to Big Steve over me, but if you want my opinion – 2 out of 4 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.