[PSYCHO screens Tuesday June 28th at the Aut-O-Rama Drive-In on a double bill with THE BIRDS.]
Review by Bob Ignizio
Alfred Hitchcock's PSYCHO
has become such a part of the cultural consciousness that it's hard to
imagine anyone today seeing the film in a spoiler-free environment. PSYCHO's
key moments and iconic imagery show up on so many clip shows and have
been parodied so often that everyone knows what happens when Marion
Crane (Janet Leigh) stops to spend the night at the little hotel run by
Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins) even if they've never seen the film
itself. That it's still a movie well worth watching even without the
element of surprise is a real testament to just how good it is.
Released in 1960, PSYCHO marks the beginning of the modern horror film as we know it. You can thank or blame it, depending on your personal tastes, for HALLOWEEN, FRIDAY THE 13TH,
and all the countless slasher films that have followed. It was also one
of the key works that helped move film in general away from the
restraints of the outdated Hollywood production code. It perhaps seems
absurd to us now, but this was the first time anyone had seen a toilet
in an American movie.
Even
more shocking for the time was the film's opening scene, in which the
unmarried Marion is shown in the same bed as her lover Sam Loomis (John
Gavin), clearly post-coitus. And of course there are the two on-screen
murders. In terms of gore, these are relatively tame compared to modern
films like SAW or even TV shows like CSI or LAW AND ORDER,
but no one had scene anything like this in 1960. And the scenes still
have impact today, thanks to the ferocity of the attacks and the
absolute perfection of how they were shot and edited.
Adapted from the Robert Bloch novel of the same name, PSYCHO follows
the book fairly close. There are changes, to be sure: Norman in the
book is an overweight alcoholic; in the film he's the rail thin Anthony
Perkins, and if he's a drinker it's never mentioned. Marion Crane is
built up considerably more in the film, with more suspense surrounding
her theft of $40,000 from the bank where she works. All of the major
scenes and plot points are carried over, but tweaked by Hitchcock and
screenwriter Joseph Stefano in such a way as to work better
cinematically, or to play up themes and ideas of particular interest to
Hitchcock. In short, it's what a good screen adaptation of a book should
be.
Are there some things about PSYCHO
that feel a little dated? Sure. There are a few driving scenes using
the old-school rear projection technique that looks so obvious to modern
eyes. The performances are all excellent, but the acting style is very
much of its time. And for all of the taboos it broke in 1960, it may
well feel to some as if the film doesn't go far enough (they're wrong,
of course). Despite all of this, you never feel like you're watching
some quaint little artifact from the past.
Thanks to the skill of Hitchcock's direction, PSYCHO
still has the power to thrill and enthrall an audience. He wasn't known
as the master of suspense for nothing. Even the most seemingly mundane
scene in the film contributes to building the tension or misdirecting
the audience from what Hitchcock really has in store for them. There is
not a wasted shot in the entire film. Add in the iconic performances of
Perkins and Leigh, and you have a film that is rightfully considered a
classic. 4 out of 4 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.