Yes, what the
chances that most of the internet-educated kids who show up for this Alfred
Hitchcock revival wind up rioting in the streets because they thought it was
that rap movie about the Notorious B.I.G.? It’s okay; bottles being thrown and
cars overturned will be good practice for the upcoming Notorious R.N.C.
As for this
NOTORIOUS, know that it’s classic Alfred Hitchcock, a crackerjack spy thriller
on the surface that hints at all sorts of perverse desire and undercurrents of
psychological aberrations
beneath its
glossy 1946 Hollywood surface.
Setting is the midst of WW2. Devlin (Cary Grant) is an Allied spy who gets
close to Alicia (Ingrid Bergman), the “notorious” femme of the title. As the wealthy
daughter of a known Nazi turncoat, she’s regarded by upper crust as an amoral, lascivious
playgirl (in today’s terms, think “reality-TV star”). But she’s really a good girl
at heart, Devlin learns.
The turning point
in their relationship comes with a legendary steamy kissing scene, lasting a
full three minutes. It shows nothing explicit, yet is somehow hotter than a lot
of what goes on in R-rated movies. Hitchcock supposedly had a merry time
getting that past the censors, chiefly by tweaking the script and dialogue to
make it seem like all they’re doing is talking about chicken dinner.
Devlin convinces Alicia
to connive herself closer to Alexander Sebastian (Claude Rains), a South American Nazi
operative in Rio running an industrial works that is somehow key to the German
war machine. Alicia goes even further than expected by marrying Sebastian
(which, in a weird way, makes her just as bad as her reputation warrants). Her
household espionage reveals the world-shattering secret project in which her
husband is engaged, but it also arouses dangerous suspicions from her spouse
and grim mother-in-law.
The film climaxes
with a simple walk down a staircase – hardly anything more than that – but you’re
biting your fingernails practically down to nothing.
Quite a bit of
Hollywood lore surrounds NOTORIOUS; again, I wonder if you internet kids (who
think Hitchcock is the title of a romantic comedy starring Will Smith) will
even appreciate that not long after it hit big, Swedish-import starlet Ingrid
Bergman had a high-profile scandal in real life over leaving her doctor husband for a top
Italian art-house director. She was denounced even on the floor of Congress by the Ohio representative (is this a proud state to live in or what?) for adultery, and thus
in a way fulfilled the image of her tainted character here.
It is also said
(but I wonder how true it is) that the plot’s big “reveal,” that the creepy-sad,
mother-dominated Claude Rains villain is working on a super-bomb project with
heavy water and the element Uranium, got insinuated into the plot by Hitchcock
and screenwriter Ben Hecht only through guesswork and chance. They just wanted
some exotic substance to be the fulcrum of the plot, and by accident relayed the
key components that US scientists at Los Alamos had formulated, in utmost secrecy, for the
atom bomb. Thus the FBI put a tail on the filmmakers for a time. Again, truth
or movie-publicity malarkey?
Hard to determine,
and really hard to care, as NOTORIOUS has enough to offer on its own terms,
as sleek, sinister and slightly subversive entertainment, a showcase piece of
Hollywood’s Golden Age. (4 out of 4 stars)
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.