Review by Pamela Zoslov
“Journalism is an inexact science, if it can be
considered a science at all,” wrote Mary Mapes, the erstwhile CBS
producer. “Done best, it requires taking chances – choosing to
doubt, choosing to believe, choosing to keep digging.” Mapes, along
with others on her staff, was ignominiously fired after questions
were raised about a “60 Minutes” segment she produced that
questioned George W. Bush's military service during the Vietnam War.
The story, aired during Bush's 2004 reelection campaign, was savagely
attacked for relying on purportedly forged documents, and also led to
the forced resignation of celebrated anchor Dan Rather.
Mapes' book, Truth and Duty: The Press, the
President, and the Privilege of Power, is the basis of the film
TRUTH. Not surprisingly, the film is immensely flattering to Mapes, who is played by the glamorously angular Cate Blanchett, and to Rather, who is portrayed by Robert Redford with uncanny vocal accuracy and a twinkle in his eye.
Written and directed by James Vanderbilt, it's an apologia for Mapes' integrity, portraying her as tough, determined, and the
victim of a right-wing spin machine. That spin machine not only
attacked but may have created the questionable “Killian documents”
that were the basis of the segment, “For the Record,” which aired
on September 8, 2004, two months before the presidential election.
The documents, provided by a retired National Guard
Lt. Col. Bill Burkett (played by Stacy Keach), were supposedly
drafted by Bush's commander, the late Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, and
implied that George W. Bush had received preferential treatment in
winning a coveted place in the Guard, and then failed to meet even
the minimal training and performance requirements of his six-year
commitment, even being AWOL for most of 1972 following a transfer to
the Alabama Air National Guard. The candidates' military service was
an explosive issue during the 2004 campaign, since Bush had sent
thousands of servicemen (including unprepared National Guardsmen) to
their deaths in an unnecessary war; his reelection chances would have
been jeopardized if it emerged that he had dodged the draft. The
Swift Boat attacks on John Kerry, which claimed Kerry had lied
about his wartime heroics, were the right-wing backlash against
questions about Bush's record.
What the film doesn't mention is that rumors had been
circulating about Bush's military service for decades, dating back to
his first campaign for public office. A question about possible
favoritism was asked by a reporter in a televised debate in 1994
against Ann Richards during Bush's campaign for Texas governor. The
reporter was angrily chastised by Bush's handlers, Karen Hughes and
Karl Rove. Bush's political team did extensive work burying the story
of Bush's spotty military record. Paperwork that would be expected to
be in his military file mysteriously went missing, and it's widely
believed the records were purged. (For invaluable background on this
history, see Russ Baker's detailed account here.
Mapes had a solid background in journalism: she
received awards and acclaim for her story on the Abu Ghraib prison
scandal and the exposé of Strom Thurmond's unacknowledged bi-racial
daughter. She had first looked into Bush's military record during the
2000 presidential campaign. But it wasn't until '04 that the “big,
juicy piece of brisket” — the Killian documents — fell into her
lap that she was able to run with it. In the film, she's a driven
workaholic who forgets to put milk on her young son's Cheerios and
has no time to take a walk with her long-suffering husband (John
Benjamin Hickey). Further, she's a champion of the underdog (“I
don't like bullies”), an impulse that has its origin in her
merciless childhood abuse by her father. (To drive home the point,
dear old Dad is still around to hurt Mary, this time by siding
publicly with her right-wing critics.)
Mapes and her “crack team” – associate producer
Lucy Scott (Elisabeth Moss), Roger Charles (Dennis Quaid) and newly
hired researcher Mike Smith (Topher Grace) – doggedly pursues
confirmation of the story. Mapes persistently calls military sources
for confirmation, getting answers ranging from a robotic “No
strings were pulled [on Bush's behalf]” to “Go fuck yourself.”
Burkett, the shadowy, ailing source of the documents,
is reluctant to appear on camera, claiming that after he originally
made the claims in 2000, “someone tried to run me off the road.”
Mapes coaxes him: “We're '60 Minutes'! We're the gold standard. We
can help you. We can protect you.” The team, under pressure from
the network to air the segment quickly, gets experts to analyze the
documents — which are copies, not originals — and relies on an
expert who pronounces the signature authentic.
The segment airs, and immediately the right-wing
blogosphere – still in its squalling infancy in 2004 – begins
savaging the story, and Mapes as the villainess behind it (calling
her, horror of horrors, “ugly” and a “witch”). The Internet
is aflame with accusations that the documents are forgeries, based in
part on typographical features supposedly not available on
typewriters in 1972. The network appoints an independent
investigative panel – Mapes calls it “corporate positioning.”
The panel is headed by Dick Thornburgh, who was Attorney General
under George H.W. Bush, and looks into Mapes' liberal political
leanings. Mapes' attorney advises her to cooperate with the panel –
“Don't fight!” Those are fighting words to Mapes, who makes a
powerful speech while under harsh cross-examination by Lawrence
Lanpher (Dermot Mulroney). Still, Mary, her team, and her father
figure, Dan Rather, all lose their jobs; Mary watches Rather's final
farewell on TV while drinking a big glass of wine (to wash down the
Xanax).
The film is James Vanderbilt's debut as a director,
and he seems to have in mind a tense newsroom thriller like ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN. If he missed that by miles, it's in part
because of timing: many viewers may only dimly remember why the issue
of military service was so hot in 2004 (“It's politics, Mary,”
says the movie's avuncular Dan Rather). It was important not just
for partisan reasons, but because of hypocrisy — Bush the
chickenhawk, having started two wars after (allegedly) dodging the
draft and neglecting his duty. It seems almost quaint by comparison to the 2016 campaign, which has a racist billionaire buffoon and reality-TV star vying with a lineup of
other crazies for the highest office in the land. Politics has
become so cynical that citizens, numbed by a constant torrent of crass
infotainment, scarcely blink.
Vanderbilt's screenplay doesn't help matters, nor
does Brian Tyler's grandiose score. The writing is schematic and obvious,
and labors mightily to exonerate Mapes. At the same time, I am
sympathetic to Mapes, having once been nominally responsible for the
publishing of a fake newspaper story, a bungle that led to my being
attacked for “liberal bias” and having a TV news camera in my
face, among other humiliations. The truth, as with the “60 Minutes”
flap, is that deadline pressure and simple ineptitude, rather than a
leftist agenda, are the usual reasons for such screw-ups. In fact, a
story can be both true and inaccurate. Consider the 2012 controversy over performance artist
Mike Daisey's one-man show about the abuses of overseas workers assembling Apple's iPhones – Daisey fudged the facts, but the story of what was happening
at the Foxconn factory in China was true. It's long been known that Bush
avoided the draft and shirked his Guard service; the record was
scrubbed, and what evidence remained could not be verified with
certainty.
Mapes' career, and Rather's legacy – he recently echoed
Mapes' “Journalism is not an exact science” line – fell into a black
hole of disinformation. 2 3/4 out of 4 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.