Review
by Bob Ignizio
Not unlike Charlie Bucket, computer
programmer Caleb (Domhnall Gleeson) wins a golden ticket in the
science fiction thriller EX MACHINA. Only his ticket doesn't
offer entree to a magical chocolate factory, but to the high tech
secluded home of his employer Nathan (Oscar Isaac), CEO of the
world's most popular search engine and a technological wizard.
Once at Nathan's home, and after
signing an extensive non disclosure agreement, the literary
comparisons switch from “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” to
“Frankenstein; or, the Modern Prometheus”. It turns out Nathan
has applied his considerable intellect and expertise to the task of
creating artificial intelligence. He just needs someone who has the
ability to discern whether his creation, Ava (Alicia Vikander),
possesses true consciousness.
Caleb will has a week to interact with
Ava and reach his conclusion, but it doesn't take nearly that long
for a connection to form between questioner and subject. But there's
more than meets the eye going on, and soon Nathan starts to question
who is really being observed, and whether his hero Nathan is really
the cool, laid back genius he tries to present himself as, or a
narcissistic, alcoholic with delusions of grandeur and a misogynistic
streak. There's also some question as to whether Ava is really what
she appears to be, not to mention Caleb himself. Tensions continue to
grow as the week goes along, with the very real possibility of things
coming to a violent head.
Written and directed by Alex Garland,
EX MACHINA is about as fine
an example of intelligent, thought provoking sci-fi as we've seen in
recent years, on a par with the films of Duncan Jones (MOON,
SOURCE CODE) and
Shane Caruth (PRIMER,
UPSTREAM COLOR). Of
course Garland has already made some contributions to raising the bar
for modern genre films as screenwriter for Danny Boyle's 28
DAYS LATER and SUNSHINE,
and Mark Romanek's NEVER LET ME GO
(He also wrote the quite enjoyable DREDD,
but it would be a stretch to put that film in the same category), but
this is his first time as a director.
Garland
takes a decidedly minimalist approach, keeping the cast small and
sticking mainly to one location (Nathan's eerily sterile high tech
home, which looks like something out of a Kubrick film but is
evidently a real hotel in Norway) and the contrastingly gorgeous
natural world outside. Special effects are kept simple, too. Ava's
robotic nature is realized in spectacular fashion, but once her
appearance has its initial impact on us, it largely ceases to matter.
Had Garland opted to depict Ava's artificial nature in an even
simpler manner, it would hardly have mattered. This the the kind of
sci-fi story that could just as easily work as a stage play, or have
been adapted as an episode of “The Twilight Zone” during its
original run.
There is a lot of food for thought in
the film about the nature of what it means to be human, and the ways
we dehumanize those we choose to see as different from ourselves.
Certainly having the AI be female was no accident, either, as Garland
uses it to explore ideas about gender, with both Nathan and Caleb
displaying sexism in different ways: Nathan is a classic misogynist,
while Caleb puts Ava up on a pedestal and sees her as needed to be
rescued. And of course the film also deals with a number of modern
and emerging technological issues; not just the very real possibility
of an AI coming into existence, but issues of privacy and
technological abuse, as well.
We've seen a lot of these ideas
explored in other stories and films, of course, but Garlarnd handles
them in a particularly deft fashion. He never lets his film's central
themes sink too far into the background, but at the same time he's
careful that his film remains compelling entertainment first and
foremost. The ending may not thrill all viewers, given how the
audience has invested in and empathized with Ava and Caleb, and how
their story ultimately plays out. But to this writer, at least, it
feels like the only way this story could have played out. 4 out of 4
stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.