Review by Charles Cassady, Jr.
In the entertainment industry, alcoholics pretty much run
things, except for the coke fiends, the heroin junkies and the Scientologists.
Alcoholics, in my increasingly bitter eyes, never seemed to lack for beautiful
doormat girlfriends, career opportunities or enablers.
And, dwelling here, near to Akron, the founding place of
Alcoholics Anonymous, all one hears all the time is the wonderfulness of Doctor
Bob and Bill W. Maybe someday Summit County will build them a theme park.
Probably called Cedar Pint. Aye, AA is the closest thing Ohio has to an
official state religion. And living here, a lifelong straight-edge such as
myself knows how an atheist must feel at Christmas.
In a provocative, borderline-angry tone (alcoholics
getting angry? Nawwwww!), Williams defiantly introduces himself as one of America's
23.5 million addicts and alcoholics in `recovery.' Yet, he says, alcoholics and
addicts and similar narcotized Twelve Steppers are missing the boat - and not
just because they're in too much a stupor to locate the gangplank.
His assertion: despite success stories fostered by
Alcoholics Anonymous and similar programs, despite orthodox medicine redefining
addiction as a "disease," the film argues that recovering (and
potentially recovering) addicts are still the subject of shame, screaming
tabloid headlines and unduly harsh prison terms (and I just can't imagine the
pressure of having all those girlfriends).
Much blame goes to the Reagan/Bush 1980s "Just Say
No" war against drugs and drug-users. A nostalgic flurry of vintage clips
portray the Nancy Reagan-led crusade, principally against crack cocaine, as a
racially tinged hysteria that meant a boom in the prison and law-enforcement
business (dig the snarling Clint Eastwood PSA). But it was a setback to
sobriety. It shored up what Williams describes as another insidious foe, the
sacred tradition of "anonymity" that silences many of those in
recovery programs.
Instead, he says, addicts should campaign boldly and
visibly for entitlements - for more funding for medical treatment, for example
- just as AIDS sufferers did. And the film does indeed have, in vintage and
modern clips, a number of bold, uncloseted recovering addicts such as First
Lady Betty Ford, entertainer Dick Van Dyke, actress Kristen Johnston, Rhode
Island state senator Tom Coderre and NBA athlete Chris Herron.
No mention of one of the first Hollywood superstars ever
to go to the media with disclosure of his dire drug-abuse problems, Bela Lugosi. A true
pioneer, though in fairness Bela didn't seem to be pushing for a change in
public policy.
When the film champions separate-but-equal "recovery
schools" for students offering a pure abstinence environment, I had to
wonder if American society really needs yet another aggrieved-minority-pressure
group lobbying away for their place pigging away at the trough of the the government dole and special
treatment. Much as THE ANONYMOUS PEOPLE demands we look at addiction as a vital
public-health issue that's been stigmatized and mishandled, much as it made me think, I guess you can say
that major tenets of THE ANONYMOUS PEOPLE rubbed me the wrong way.
It may or may not be related that a California professor
emeritus (oh, what would we do without college professors?) was on the radio
this week saying that being in killer street gangs was also a
"disease," not the 'bangaz' fault, and should be treated as such. So
being gangsta is an underfunded public health issue too, huh? Maybe that
advocacy documentary is also in the pipeline. (99 and 44/100 per cent out of
four stars; sorry, I just had to put that in there)
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.