Review by Charles Cassady, Jr.
With few exceptions, critics regard 1964's
MARNIE as one of Alfred Hitchcock's more disappointing pictures - though,
considering that the Master of Suspense had just delivered PSYCHO and THE
BIRDS, it had some hard acts to follow. And, if one swallows the a la mode
film-lit publishing dogma (recently dramatized in a few motion pictures), one
is given to understand that Hitchcock was not only a virtuoso suspense-film
storyteller but a genuine depraved personality whose movies can be interpreted
as abnormal-psych evidence (oh, but Hollywood was sooooooo grateful to make money
off him while the gentleman was alive). MARNIE, therefore is full of meaty
Freudian-interpretation stuff for savvy viewers.
(Personally, I'd think you wannabe profilers would be
more useful to society scrutinizing the films and possible criminal MOs of
Woody Allen, Roman Polanski and - we're now told - Bryan Singer. But I guess
that would affect finances of present-day movie studios and their parent
multinational corporations. Now that would be a real crime. Nothing to see
here, move on people. Go to that MARNIE showing in 50th-anniversary revival instead.)
Hitchcock's
dark romance, "sex mystery," as the blurb-writers of its era called it,
deserves a second glance in any
case, for its complex themes and remarkable cast (and what the heck is a
"sex mystery," anyway?). Tippi Hedren, the frosty, blonde Hitchcock
"discovery" cast in
THE BIRDS plays the title character, Marnie Edgar, a compulsive thief on the Eastern Seaboard with a pattern of getting
jobs under assumed names, then stealing from successive employers and walking
away, erasing her identity in her escape.
Okay, three things: (1) Amounts of money we find out
she's taken in these meticulous capers, like ten thousand dollars ($10,000),
will just make you want to weep. Now, in local government, if you haven't
nicked at least that much in one month, HR will put you on notice. Don't want
any slackers in Cuyahoga County!
(2) It's kind of a given that career criminal Marnie is
fiendishly successful at getting fresh work because she's good looking, and her
bosses are lusty, dumpy, grumpy middle-aged men. I think much of the employment
marketplace still indeed operates that way, only these Great Recession days
you've political correctness and "feminism" in addition dictating
that women get handed what few jobs are available. The Marnies of 2014 may as
well confess during the interview that they'll probably rob the till. They'll
get hired anyway. Likely by Barack Obama Executive Order.
(3) The folded-over valise that Marnie is carrying
holding her loot at the beginning - is it supposed to look like female
genitalia? Or am I just warped and pervy from all the sick gossip I've heard
about Hitchcock? Maybe I should gaze at some ink blots.
We are tipped off early that cool, sophisticated Marnie, like
Holly Golightly in BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY'S (book and film) hails from rural
poor-white origins, and some of her pathology arises from an obsession to transcend
the sordid world in which her slatternly maw (Louise Latham) raised her. Then,
out for a new score, Marnie applies for a secretarial position at Rutland,
a family firm run by young widower Mark Rutland (aye, Sean Connery). Maybe the
Winston Graham source novel for MARNIE, that I've never seen, explains how
Mark's wife died. But we don't learn anything about it here, except the
handsome but steely, not particularly grieving "licensed to kill"
hero keeps a display-case of mementoes, kind of Bluebeard-like.
Rutland recognizes Marnie as the femme fatale who's been
ripping off business associates, but he foxily lets the new hire go through
with breaking into his safe. With evidence of her guilt, he blackmails Marnie
into marrying him, claiming that he's genuinely fallen for her. Still, their
honeymoon cruise is cold and traumatic. Mark has to coach Marnie on how to fit
in with his mansion-dwelling upper-class family, who, ironically, look askance
at trapped Marnie as being some kind of gold-digger interloper from parts
unknown.
Especially
suspicious of Marnie is Mark's own sister
(Diane Baker), whose possessive hovering and kissy-face stuff around her
virile brother suggests, what exactly? Latent incest? Or Charles
Cassady being more
pervy? Hey, those sleaze websites were already bookmarked in the laptop
when I
bought it at the thrift store! And I can't log on with old Netscape
Navigator
anyway! I swear!
Ultimately, Mark's sleuthing uncovers the hideous truth
behind Marnie’s mania, though it’s not too much of a spoiler alert to find out
that her insane phobia about the color red means something very nasty occurred
in Marnie’s youth. Sean Connery’s hard-driving husband is surely one character
who has improved with the times; dude doesn’t just indulge in tough love, he’s
into sadistic love. No kidding, controlling Mark Rutland would be a dream date for the
Fifty Shades of Grey porn-reading mom demographic of the 21st century.
One positive reviewer called MARNIE the most “poetic” and
“liberated” of Hitchcock’s films, and even said that the tacky rear-projection
in the driving scenes were deliberate artifice to reflect the heroine’s damaged
POV. Well… I don’t know about that part. But the movie isn’t the writeoff that
so many movie guides claims it is. (3 out of 4 stars)
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.