[IS THE MAN WHO IS TALL HAPPY?
screens Saturday March 1st at 7:05 pm and Sunday March 2nd at 5:10 pm
at the Cleveland Cinematheque.]
Review
by Bob Ignizio
There is little doubt that language
professor, philosopher, and political activist Noam Chomsky has some
interesting ideas. There is also little doubt that filmmaker Michel Gondry makes thought
provoking and visually arresting movies. IS THE MAN WHO IS TALL
HAPPY? puts these two men
together in a room where Gondry, an unabashed fan of Chomsky, gets to
ask the octogenarian intellectual pretty much whatever pops into his head. The
resulting flow of ideas is then transformed into animation that
illustrates what is being discussed, at least in as much as some of
these ideas can be illustrated.
While
this approach certainly helps keep the film more visually stimulating
that just watching two people sit together and talk for an hour and a
half, as Gondry points out in his introduction, it also serves
another purpose. In his opinion, when people watch a documentary on a
person, they assume that the film speaks for its subject. Gondry
disagrees with this notion, believing instead that due to the various
choices the filmmaker makes, a documentary is at least as much giving
that filmmaker's vision as that of the person the film is ostensibly
about. So in order to jar the viewer out thinking that what they are
seeing is purely Chomsky's point of view, Gondry has placed his film
slightly outside of reality through the use of animation.
As an
abstract concept, I get it. As the concrete reality that is IS
THE MAN WHO IS TALL HAPPY?, it
doesn't quite work. Sometimes Gondry's cruedly drawn illustrations
help bring clarity to the subjects under discussion, but just as
often they do not. And while this is certainly a matter of personal
aesthetics, I found the art style grating. It also doesn't help that
Gondry often has difficulty communicating with Chomsky due to some
difficulties on Gondry's part with the English language.
There
are still some interesting ideas explored in the film, particularly
regarding Chomsky's belief that language is innate rather than
learned. It's just that these ideas seem better suited for a book or one of Chomsky's lectures (many of which are available on various formats)
than a film. It's obvious Gondry is passionate about bringing Chomsky
to a wider and/or different audience, but this just doesn't seem like
the best entry point for the uninitiated. Those who already share
Gondry's enthusiasm for Chomsky may well enjoy the film more. 2 out
of 4 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.