[THE ACT OF KILLING screens Friday January 3rd at 9:00 pm and Saturday January 4th at 7:05 pm at the Cleveland Cinematheque.]
Review by R.J. Justavick
Joshua
Oppenheimer’s film THE ACT OF KILLING is a harsh, disturbing, but
immensely watchable film that tells the story of a gang of Indonesian
movie ticket scalpers turned cold blooded, state sanctioned murderers in
the 1960’s. Sure, films like this come around every so often, and while
they shock and send the mind racing to come to conclusions of how
people could be so cruel, none has ever tackled the subject matter of
genocide in quite the way Oppenheimer does. Rather than just interview
his subjects about the blood on their hands, Oppenheimer gets them to
actually re-enact their atrocities for the camera, as if they are
starring in their own Hollywood production.
The
main focus of the film is a man named Anwar Congo, a one time petty
hood who, through the turmoil within Indonesia’s political system in
1965, was promoted (along with his “friends”) into a ruthless death
squad that was responsible for: torturing and killing anyone who went
against the government, extortion of local business owners, and rigging
of elections. Anwar and his pals are shown around town as local heroes,
loved by the North Sumatran citizens. They are so beloved that Congo and
his partners even get invited onto local television shows to describe
the “work” they did (with props!). Congo and his pals seem to have no
problem showing how to torture and kill. In fact, they seem to relish
the attention it has brought them.
It isn’t until Congo
has the opportunity to actually recreate his slayings in true Hollywood
fashion that the cracks in his very proud armor begin to show. For most
of the documentary, he seems more than happy with the idea of directing
and starring in his own story, worrying more about what the world may
think of his grey hair than the fact that he beheaded innocent people on
a seemingly daily basis. When he finally does start directing his
stories, and meeting up with his old partners in crime, that's when you
can see that maybe the marbles are starting to roll in old Anwar’s head,
and that he may finally realize that he has a very big karmic mountain
to climb. But Oppenheimer doesn’t let Anwar off the hook, and his camera
never gives him penance for his deeds. The film couldn’t work if it
gave Anwar any type of hope for escaping the dreams that secretly haunt
him. The way it is, it’s certainly one of the best films I’ve seen so
far this year.
Watching THE ACT OF KILLING became one
of the most surreal experiences I have ever had with a film. I’ve seen
dozens upon dozens of documentaries that deal with atrocities, but never
one where the killers themselves were so willing, even eager to talk
about what they’ve done, and not out of guilt, but pride. It’s a
completely off-putting experience and I kept having to take myself out
of the movie to find a kind of stable ground for my mental state before
going back into Anwar’s world. It’s definitely odd to watch a doddering
old man hold his grandchild with such affection and care one second and
then listen to and watch him explain just the right way to strangle a
man the next. There are many more experiences in the film that just keep
your jaw on the floor as you ponder how someone could inflict so much
pain on another person, just because he’s allowed to. 4 out of 4 stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.