[COCKSUCKER BLUES screens
Friday November 15th at 9:15 pm at the Cleveland Cinematheque. Adults
only!]
Review by Bob Ignizio
The bad boys of rock & roll, The Rolling Stones, gave
photographer Robert Frank full access to film their 1972 American
tour in support of Exile on Main Street,
their first since the tragic events of the Stones free concert at
Altamont in 1968. Frank took the band at their word, filming all (and
I do mean all) aspects of life on the road for hedonistic rock stars.
The resulting film, COCKSUCKER
BLUES,
shocked even the band and has never been officially released,
although bootleg copies can be found without too much difficulty. And
on certain rare occasions, the band allows theatrical screenings at
serious film venues like the Cleveland Cinematheque, which is where
you can see it make its Cleveland big screen debut on Friday November
15th at 9:15 pm.
The documentary is shot in raw
and unvarnished fashion that does its best to simply capture the
reality of its subjects, and based on what we see, the band and their
crew must have gotten comfortable enough with Frank and his crew that
they didn't really think about what they were doing while being
filmed. So we see the roadies messing around with naked groupies
while members of the band look on laughing, Mick snorting cocaine,
and all other manner of general debauchery. We also experience a lot
of the tedium of being a band on the road, sitting around hotel
rooms, having to answer the same stupid questions from music
journalists, doing sound checks, and so on. And occasionally, we even
get to witness the band in their element, performing live at the peak
of their powers.
It's hard not to feel
uncomfortable at some points in the film, particularly the undeniable
misogyny of how the groupies are treated. Aside from the musical
numbers, there really is very little to be found here that could be
considered enjoyable by most viewers. But it does capture a reality
that both sordid and dull in which the whole rock n roll fantasy
comes off as kind of sad, pathetic, and soul destroying.
Of course at least some of that
fantasy has to be true as well, or why else would a band like the
Stones still be going on the road some 41 (!) years later, as they
did this past summer? It wouldn't be fair to say Frank has done a
hatchet job on the band, since (despite a disclaimer at the beginning
of the film that says, “Except for the musical numbers the events
depicted in this film are fictitious. No representation of actual
persons and events is intended.”) the footage we see is real and,
presumably, unstaged. But it's clear also that Frank was most
interested in the dark side of the rock & roll dream, and through
his choices in the editing room that's mostly what we see. Still,
given how so many music “documentaries” are little more than
promotional puff pieces, Frank can certainly be forgiven for making
his film an antidote, and as unpleasant as it is to watch, fans of
the Stones and rock music in general should find it fascinating. 3
out of 4 stars.
Astonishing document of its time. The marvellous Robert Frank's cinematographic style, editing choices and access to the probably too personal side of the Stones & friends on the road make this an fascinating watch.
ReplyDeleteBy order of the PC fascists and kommissars, this movie review must now be shut down because of the homophobic slur in the title. Into the paddy wagon, Cleveland Cinematheque audience, Cleveland Movie Blog readership! Sit next to Alec Baldwin back there.
ReplyDelete