Review by Bob Ignizio
With its 2 1/2 hour running time, deadly serious tone, and a cast
and crew of Hollywood heavyweights, several past Oscar nominees and
winners among them, it's clear before you even see the first frame of
film that PRISONERS is going
for some Oscar gold of its own. One can only hope the Academy doesn't
take the bait, as Hollywood doesn't need the encouragement to crank
out more bloated, ridiculous thrillers like this one.
Opening with a scene
that is not so much relevant to its plot as it is to its alleged themes,
PRISONERS lets you
know right from the start that it thinks it's an important, serious film. Survivalist dad Keller
Dover (Hugh Jackman) is explaining to his son Ralph (Dylan Minnette) the
importance of always being prepared right after the boy has displayed
his hunting skill by taking out a deer with one shot. Then
we're off with the Dover family – which also includes Keller's wife
Grace (Maria Bello) and daughter Anna (Erin Gerasimovich) – for
Thanksgiving dinner with the neighboring Birch family – dad
Franklin (Terrence Howard), mom Nancy (Viola Davis) and daughters
Eliza (Zoe Soul) and Joy (Kyla Drew Simmons). Shortly after dinner,
Anna and Joy will take a walk over to Anna's house and disappear.
The only clue to what happened
is a shabby looking RV that Ralph remembers the girls playing on
earlier, now gone from where it had been parked in front of a nearby
house. After a search by the frantic parents fails to yield results,
the police are called in with Detective Loki (Jake Gyllenhaal)
heading up the investigation. He has a reputation for solving every
case he's taken on, and it isn't long before he finds the RV and its
driver Alex (Paul Dano), a simpleton whose disheveled appearance and suspicious mannerisms practically scream “movie psycho”. But there's
simply not enough evidence to hold the guy, and he gets released into the
custody of his Aunt Holly (Melissa Leo).
Keller is certain that Alex is
the guilty party, and since he doesn't think the police are doing
their job, he decides to do it for them, kidnapping Alex and taking
him to an abandoned apartment building. There Kellen tortures the man, fearing that time is of the essence if
the girls are to be found alive. Meanwhile Detective Loki stumbles
upon another mystery from the past and finds a potential
new suspect in another squirrelly looking character named Bob Taylor (David
Dastmalchian).
The moral question PRISONERS
makes a pretense of asking is whether Keller is justified in
his actions, and what sort of effect does going down that road have
on him and his friends and family. I say it makes a pretense of
asking that question because, in the end, the film isn't particularly
interested in answering it, or even giving the audience much in the
way of food for thought on the subject. There's a difference between
showing that an issue is black and white, and trying to have it both
ways, and the way PRISONERS
handles its central theme is definitely in the latter category. It wants to come off as having something of substance to say, but doesn't want to risk ruffling any feathers by actually taking a stand one way or the other.
Rather than being the
substantive crime drama it thinks it is, what we have here instead is
a “B” level suspense thriller that takes itself too seriously and
drags on far too long. Not only is it unwilling to take a firm
position on Keller's vigilantism, it has nothing new or worthwhile to
say about the grief parents in such a situation go through, or the
sort of things that would drive someone to commit such crimes. The
motivation for the child abductions is especially absurd, some hokum about "waging a war on God". Other aspects of the film are equally ridiculous - for example, apparently everyone in Pennsylvania ignores police cars that come
barreling down the road with lights flashing. I know, we see that kind of nonsense in action movies all the time, but again, this is supposed to be a more serious film than that.
And if you're hoping for at least some interesting characters to make the film tolerable, forget it. The characters in PRISONERS are thinly written caricatures at best, and in some
cases so underutilized as to beg the question of why they're even in
the movie. At least Jackman's “going for the Oscar” scenery
chewing, Dano and Dastmalchian's central-casting creepiness, and
Gyllenhaal's twitchy intensity offer some entertainment value, but that's not exactly a compliment.
While the script and
performances bear some of the blame, in the end the lion's share
would seem to rest on director Denis Villeneuve's shoulders. After
all, this is a talented cast, and it's up to the director to make
sure they aren't going over the top or fading into the scenery. It's
also ultimately up to the director to look at the script and recognize when things need to be pared down. If
PRISONERS had been an
hour and a half/hour and 45 minute straightforward action film, its
implausibilities and absurdities wouldn't have grated nearly so much and it
might even have been kind of fun. The intent, however, seems to have
been to make a film more on a level with SILENCE OF THE
LAMBS or GONE BABY
GONE despite the fact that the material was in now way up to snuff, and that's simply a recipe for failure. 2
out of 4 stars
No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.