[MICHAEL screens Friday April 27th at 9:20 pm at the Cleveland Cinematheque.]
Review by Bob Ignizio
MICHAEL is
the kind of movie that will no doubt lead some to question why anyone
would want to watch such a thing. There's no question of quality here –
this film, the directorial debut of Markus Schleinzer, is
about as perfectly executed as one could want. That's provided, of
course, that what one wants is a stark, chilling, and completely
unsensationalized look at a pedophile.
Michael (Michael Fuith) is a plain looking man who works at an insurance company and essentialy personifies the phrase “the banality of evil”.
Neither his family nor his co-workers would ever suspect that he has a
10 year old boy (David Rauchenberger) locked up in his basement. As we
see him feeding the child, taking care of the boy when he's sick, even
taking him on trips to the zoo, we can only imagine that in some sick
way, Michael has convinced himself that he's actually parenting the boy.
We do not see any scenes of actual molestation. Instead the film opts to convey its horrors through suggestion and implication,
which is quite effective enough at inducing queasiness in the viewer.
One scene at a dinner table, however, is less visually restrained and
may well cross the line for some viewers, even those not already driven
off by the subject matter and general tone of the film.
Schleinzer
makes no attempt to explain why Michael is the way he is, or to
generate any sympathy for him. In Schleinzer's view, the man is a
monster, pure and simple, and there is nothing that can or should
mitigate that fact. The film does offer occasional moments of pitch
black humor, and eventually there's a catharsis of a sort, but those are
rather small rewards for enduring an hour and a half of grim
unpleasantness.
Of
course there are those who find depictions of the darker aspects of
life interesting in and of themselves, and on that level 'Michael' is
certainly an egrossing and expertly crafted film. Anyone else is advised
to exercise their personal judgment as to whether or not they want to
watch a film which depicts such a disturbing scenario with such a cold
and detached eye. 3 out of 4 stars.
As published on Examiner.com


No comments:
Post a Comment
We approve all legitimate comments. However, comments that include links to irrelevant commercial websites and/or websites dealing with illegal or inappropriate content will be marked as spam.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.